🎯 Learning intentions
- I can generate 3 different bridge design ideas using SCAMPER as a thinking tool.
- I can analyse each idea using the PMI technique (Plus / Minus / Interesting) — this is what the APHS rubric marks.
- I can give my partner constructive feedback using Elements & Principles of Design.
✅ Success criteria
- My Workbook §4 has 3 labelled thumbnail sketches (2D + at least one 3D attempt).
- My Workbook §5 PMI table is complete — Plus, Minus and Interesting points for each idea.
- I have given my partner written feedback on each of their sketches.
Do Now · 5 min
Look at your L06 Sydney Harbour Bridge research. 2 minutes in your workbook:
- One feature I like from the SHB or my research.
- One feature I would change.
- One colour/pattern idea for my bridge.
I Do · ~10 min Teacher demonstration
Part 1 — SCAMPER for idea generation. A tool to force your brain to vary ONE thing at a time:
- Substitute — swap materials/parts
- Combine — mix two bridge types
- Adapt — borrow a feature from another bridge
- Modify — change size, shape or thickness
- Put to another use — imagine a different load
- Eliminate — remove something (e.g. verticals)
- Reverse — flip the truss pattern
Teacher sketches 3 bridge ideas live on the board, each using a different SCAMPER operation.
Part 2 — PMI Analysis (de Bono's Plus/Minus/Interesting). This is the analysis technique the APHS rubric specifically marks.
| Column | What it means | Sentence starter |
|---|---|---|
| Plus (+) | What's GOOD about this design? | "One good thing about this design is… because…" |
| Minus (−) | What's a problem? | "A problem with this design might be…" |
| Interesting (?) | What's unique or worth trying? | "An interesting idea is… I could try… to make it stronger / lighter…" |
Teacher writes a PMI row for one of the 3 live sketches, using the sentence starters.
We Do · ~15 min Guided practice
Together we evaluate one of the teacher's sketches using BOTH PMI and Elements & Principles of Design from Term 1:
- PMI: 1 Plus + 1 Minus + 1 Interesting on the board
- Elements: does it use line, shape, form well?
- Principles: is it balanced? Does it have rhythm (repeating triangles)?
- Function: will it hold weight?
- Aesthetics: does it look good?
You Do · ~35 min Independent pair work
Part 1 — Workbook §4 — 3 thumbnail sketches (15 min).
- Both partners sketch. 3 thumbnail sketches each, using 3 different SCAMPER operations.
- Each sketch: half a page, pencil, labelled with materials + span.
- Include at least one 3D attempt (use your Term 1 isometric skills).
Part 2 — Workbook §5 PMI Analysis (15 min). Fill in the PMI table — 3 columns (Plus / Minus / Interesting) × 3 rows (one per sketch). Use the APHS sentence starters.
Part 3 — Peer review + decide (5 min).
- Swap workbooks with ANOTHER pair. Give written feedback on each of their sketches: 1 thing they did well (Element/Principle language) + 1 improvement suggestion.
- With your partner, pick your favourite sketch — this is the one you'll scale-draw in L08.
Differentiation
🪜Support
Pre-drawn truss outline — modify rather than draw from scratch. PMI sentence-starter scaffold with first row pre-filled for Idea 1.
🎯Core
3 original sketches + full PMI table + peer review round.
🚀Extension
Add a cost-benefit table alongside PMI (sticks used, expected strength, difficulty) — bridges into Extension for your §2 Specification.
Exit Ticket · 5 min
- Which SCAMPER operation helped you most today?
- Which of your 3 sketches did you choose for the final, and why? (Use PMI language — 1 plus + 1 minus of your chosen idea.)
📚 Resources for this lesson
Before you leave Quick check-in
🚩 Stuck or confused?
Click this button to flag to Ms Gao that you need a 1-to-1 next lesson. Your message is copied — paste it into a Google Classroom private comment.
📄 Export journal so far
Save your journal as a .txt file to upload to Google Classroom for Ms Gao's Friday review.
📓 Open journal + export